<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft AOL Patent Theater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-aol-patent-theater</link>
	<description>Cringely on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savannah Banahan</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-214135</link>
		<dc:creator>Savannah Banahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-214135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->I know a lot about insurance but I sure know little about how to leverage the computer for marketing. Internet Marketing for Insurance Agents show me EXACTLY what to do. The Click-by-Click coverage is what computer novices like me need. I am getting a much better handle on how to improve our Google ranking which I see as being the KEY to being found. Although we are going to work the social networking more, we need to focus a lot on Google Places in my opinion. I also see us as utilizing YouTube videos to help our existing customers learn more about what additional coverage might help them. Overall, this book was an EXCELLENT value for my agendy. <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a lot about insurance but I sure know little about how to leverage the computer for marketing. Internet Marketing for Insurance Agents show me EXACTLY what to do. The Click-by-Click coverage is what computer novices like me need. I am getting a much better handle on how to improve our Google ranking which I see as being the KEY to being found. Although we are going to work the social networking more, we need to focus a lot on Google Places in my opinion. I also see us as utilizing YouTube videos to help our existing customers learn more about what additional coverage might help them. Overall, this book was an EXCELLENT value for my agendy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: house extension costs sydney</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-211702</link>
		<dc:creator>house extension costs sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 02:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-211702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->&lt;strong&gt;is a difference between a follower and...&lt;/strong&gt;

a fan/friend. fans and friends will be more engaged wile followers are a lot less likely to click on a link you tweet or respond to you update or question. so setting a straightforward goal like the one above is all... <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>is a difference between a follower and&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>a fan/friend. fans and friends will be more engaged wile followers are a lot less likely to click on a link you tweet or respond to you update or question. so setting a straightforward goal like the one above is all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VB.Net, C#, C++</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-209800</link>
		<dc:creator>VB.Net, C#, C++</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-209800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->&lt;strong&gt;VB.Net, C#, C++...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]I, Cringely &#187; Blog Archive Microsoft AOL Patent Theater - I, Cringely - Cringely on technology[...]... <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>VB.Net, C#, C++&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]I, Cringely &raquo; Blog Archive Microsoft AOL Patent Theater &#8211; I, Cringely &#8211; Cringely on technology[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-208335</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-208335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->&quot;Maybe Microsoft will cross-license with Facebook, making the loss immaterial.&quot; Right on the money.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/facebook-microsoft-strike-a-patent-deal/2012/04/23/gIQAJSfKcT_story.html <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe Microsoft will cross-license with Facebook, making the loss immaterial.&#8221; Right on the money.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/facebook-microsoft-strike-a-patent-deal/2012/04/23/gIQAJSfKcT_story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/facebook-microsoft-strike-a-patent-deal/2012/04/23/gIQAJSfKcT_story.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegan Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-207960</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegan Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-207960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->&lt;strong&gt;Vegan Christian...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]I, Cringely &#187; Blog Archive Microsoft AOL Patent Theater - I, Cringely - Cringely on technology[...]... <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vegan Christian&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]I, Cringely &raquo; Blog Archive Microsoft AOL Patent Theater &#8211; I, Cringely &#8211; Cringely on technology[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-207378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-207378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->We&#039;ve already had some enquiries from US and Canadian companies wanting to move to NZ just on the strength of our pending (not yet enacted) anti-software patent legislation. <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve already had some enquiries from US and Canadian companies wanting to move to NZ just on the strength of our pending (not yet enacted) anti-software patent legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Laen</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-207376</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Laen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-207376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->You&#039;re spot on Ming. We&#039;ve enetered the age of digital abundance. The old rules to encourage investment which was capital intensive do not apply to software 99.9% of the time. The old incentives are unnecessary, and the patent system should be changed to exclude software. We convinced our government to do that here in NZ - they - after public consultation, the parties in government supported the exclusion of software from patentability unanimously. 

Sadly, the proposed legislation hasn&#039;t been passed into law yet, and the impending &quot;Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement&quot; (an FTA with the US) may overrule that, as the US is trying to use FTAs to inflict its fundamentally broken IP regime on the rest of the world (whose politicians typically don&#039;t understand this stuff at the best of times). <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re spot on Ming. We&#8217;ve enetered the age of digital abundance. The old rules to encourage investment which was capital intensive do not apply to software 99.9% of the time. The old incentives are unnecessary, and the patent system should be changed to exclude software. We convinced our government to do that here in NZ &#8211; they &#8211; after public consultation, the parties in government supported the exclusion of software from patentability unanimously. </p>
<p>Sadly, the proposed legislation hasn&#8217;t been passed into law yet, and the impending &#8220;Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement&#8221; (an FTA with the US) may overrule that, as the US is trying to use FTAs to inflict its fundamentally broken IP regime on the rest of the world (whose politicians typically don&#8217;t understand this stuff at the best of times).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TemporalBeing</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-206122</link>
		<dc:creator>TemporalBeing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-206122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->The only problem with your analysis is that if AOL sat on it too long they would not have been able to sue Microsoft over the patents.

Remember, lack of enforcement means loss of the patent right - once you know  party is infringing you have a limited time to notify them before enforcement damages (willful or not) are expunged.

So, Microsoft may not be able to enforce them either.

Meaning, Microsoft may have transferred money to AOL without getting anything real in return, aside from perhaps peace of mind which the lawyers probably already had - especially if it had been sitting for a decade already (they were probably well in the clear).

Of course, it may just be more cannon fodder for FUD - for the Microsoft-Mosaid-Nokia deal, for Google, and others - to try to get everyone to pay-up for something that is ultimately worthless. <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with your analysis is that if AOL sat on it too long they would not have been able to sue Microsoft over the patents.</p>
<p>Remember, lack of enforcement means loss of the patent right &#8211; once you know  party is infringing you have a limited time to notify them before enforcement damages (willful or not) are expunged.</p>
<p>So, Microsoft may not be able to enforce them either.</p>
<p>Meaning, Microsoft may have transferred money to AOL without getting anything real in return, aside from perhaps peace of mind which the lawyers probably already had &#8211; especially if it had been sitting for a decade already (they were probably well in the clear).</p>
<p>Of course, it may just be more cannon fodder for FUD &#8211; for the Microsoft-Mosaid-Nokia deal, for Google, and others &#8211; to try to get everyone to pay-up for something that is ultimately worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angry dude</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-206079</link>
		<dc:creator>angry dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-206079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->Ha-Ha-Ha

YOu obviously are very far from anything patent-related

Patent &quot;business&quot; is not for the faint of a pocketbook to begin with...

Those potential infringers are not &quot;kids&quot; - they are huge corporate monstrosities

They make sure to hide infringement deep enough so it is prohibitively expensive to uncover,
even in case of software-implemented technology, not even talking about FPGAa or ASICs

Writing cease-and-desist letter to a big company will automatically bring you a declaratory judgement lawsuit,
 in a remote jurisdiction - they know how to bankrupt us, little guys

SO all I can do for now is whine in this and other blogs

And you are right, unless you are a shrewd (and cut-throat) business person with a clear plan on how to extract money from the industry,
you have no business patenting anything

I should have known better... <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha-Ha-Ha</p>
<p>YOu obviously are very far from anything patent-related</p>
<p>Patent &#8220;business&#8221; is not for the faint of a pocketbook to begin with&#8230;</p>
<p>Those potential infringers are not &#8220;kids&#8221; &#8211; they are huge corporate monstrosities</p>
<p>They make sure to hide infringement deep enough so it is prohibitively expensive to uncover,<br />
even in case of software-implemented technology, not even talking about FPGAa or ASICs</p>
<p>Writing cease-and-desist letter to a big company will automatically bring you a declaratory judgement lawsuit,<br />
 in a remote jurisdiction &#8211; they know how to bankrupt us, little guys</p>
<p>SO all I can do for now is whine in this and other blogs</p>
<p>And you are right, unless you are a shrewd (and cut-throat) business person with a clear plan on how to extract money from the industry,<br />
you have no business patenting anything</p>
<p>I should have known better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grunchy</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2012/04/12/microsoft-aol-patent-theater#comment-206028</link>
		<dc:creator>Grunchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=3894#comment-206028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!-- insert ads is firing -->Actually, you know what - angry dude I have an idea that you could try.  What you could do is you could find someone who is infringing your patented technology, and you could write them a &quot;cease and desist&quot; order, that demands licensing fees from them in order that they can continue using your technology, and warns that you may be forced to pursue legal action if they don&#039;t pay.  Take a half hour of time, write up the letter, mail it out and see what happens.

That&#039;s what a genuine business person does.  He sets up a candy store, a kid walks in and grabs a handful of candy, and as the customer is walking out the business person says &quot;either pay me some money before you leave with that candy or I may be forced to report you to the police&quot;.  99 times out of a hundred they&#039;ll pay you the money, and that&#039;s what business is.  That&#039;s pretty much how easy it is to be a business person. <iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=icr0c-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B008NA3HZY&ref=tf_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1<1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&npa=1&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 <br/> <br/>
<a href="http://www.weblamb.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.weblamb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/vertical-horizonal-logo2-final2_130w.jpg"></a> 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you know what &#8211; angry dude I have an idea that you could try.  What you could do is you could find someone who is infringing your patented technology, and you could write them a &#8220;cease and desist&#8221; order, that demands licensing fees from them in order that they can continue using your technology, and warns that you may be forced to pursue legal action if they don&#8217;t pay.  Take a half hour of time, write up the letter, mail it out and see what happens.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what a genuine business person does.  He sets up a candy store, a kid walks in and grabs a handful of candy, and as the customer is walking out the business person says &#8220;either pay me some money before you leave with that candy or I may be forced to report you to the police&#8221;.  99 times out of a hundred they&#8217;ll pay you the money, and that&#8217;s what business is.  That&#8217;s pretty much how easy it is to be a business person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk
Object Caching 668/673 objects using disk

 Served from: www.cringely.com @ 2013-05-21 06:52:32 by W3 Total Cache -->