Mobile 2010 Predictions: Apple, Google & RIM, Oh My!
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Near the eve of Apple’s tablet announcement, I’d like to turn my 2010 predictive eye again to the mobile space where, as my title suggests, there are only three software players that matter — Apple, Google, and RIM (Blackberry).
But wait a minute, isn’t Nokia the big Kahuna in this space and aren’t they right now suing the heck out of Apple? Yes, but that’s an act of desperation, a stalling tactic intended just to slow Apple down or, possibly, send some useful license revenue from Cupertino to Finland. It doesn’t change the inevitable.
So-called “feature phones” are going away, to be replaced within two product cycles (three years, tops) entirely by smart phones driven by mobile app stores and the need for carriers to generate additional revenue. It’s not like you’ll even be able to find a feature phone to buy.
The smart phone marketplace will consolidate around three operating systems — Android, Blackberry, and OS X. Though there will be some ups and down in the market and the complete transition will take longer to complete than my usual 12-month timeline, Symbian, Windows Phone, and every other smart phone OS that isn’t from Apple, Google, or RIM, are likely to die or be reduced to insignificance.
None of these platforms expect to die, but that’s the way it is with these things. You don’t expect to lose until you’ve lost, generally.
On some level Nokia even thinks it still has a chance to win the war, but it doesn’t.
Nokia has faith in its very popular cross-platform application development environment, Qt, which it acquired in 2008 with the $153 million acquisition of Norwegian company Trolltech, father of Qt. Nokia sees Qt as its secret sauce — a potent weapon against Apple.
Qt, like any of a number of 4GLs can write once and deploy a lot of places. Where Qt is different from the other 4GLs (in the mind of Nokia at least) is that it manages to do what it does without killing app performance, probably because Qt began as a mobile product and mobile apps have to be lean and fast.
So Qt is growing up at just the time applications and OSes are growing down, thanks to OS X and the iPhone. Qt has made notable progress supporting 3D apps and a huge variety of processors, chipsets, and GPUs. They showed at CES the same apps running from the same source on a ton of different hardware platforms from handsets to desktops to set top boxes. And now Nokia has reportedly done the unthinkable, which is to rewrite Maemo, its Linux, in Qt.
Meanwhile, Apple has been rolling forward with its PA Semi strategy, the first fruit of which we’ll apparently see announced next week. I sense that Apple is headed toward a family of devices from handhelds to servers all linked to a cloud and ostensibly running the same OS. Apple is mining the ARM ecosystem for this move in addition to its own PA Semi extensions.
Nokia thinks that, through either Qt or various legal moves (or both), it can slow Apple’s mobile juggernaut. They won’t, and here’s why.
Apple hires the meanest lawyers it can find, paying extra bucks for that “kick them for good measure” attitude. I know a company that had long legal battles with both Microsoft and Apple and they said Apple’s legal team was far worse than Microsoft’s, hands down. So while Nokia’s appeal to the World Trade Organization (WTO) to punish Apple, is an act of desperation, Apple’s similar response is just the way they do these things.
This legal situation is going to get uglier and uglier but in the end it will be settled with patent cross-licensing, no monetary damages or license fees, and Nokia feeling relieved to get out of the negotiating room alive.
This will happen, I believe, because Apple doesn’t really give a damn about Qt or Nokia. They care much more about Google and Microsoft.
Nokia is going to fail in using Qt and Symbian to compete with Android or iPhone application frameworks because Nokia just doesn’t understand software. Nokia is a hardware company that does software and hardware companies aren’t fighting this new war, they just build the weapons.
Remember Apple is a software company that sells its products in an expensive hardware box.
Ultimately (more than 12 months from now) there will be a shakeout and Nokia will drop Symbian and even Maemo in favor of Google’s Android and Nokia custom apps, UI, and hardware.
Meanwhile Microsoft will cut its rumored (and incredibly expensive) iPhone search deal with Apple, then it will introduce Windows Phone 7, which will fail to gain market traction for Redmond. Microsoft will ultimately align with Apple to avoid the embarrassment of working with Google, but this alignment will be solely for mobile.
That is unless Microsoft buys RIM and then doesn’t screw it up.
Come on now, your Qt history is a bit off, you should know better. It was not even available on a mobile platform until 2008… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(toolkit)
It is much more like apples cocoa framework then you say. Nokia STILL has more then 50% of the world market. Apple does not have the diversity to supply the needs or demands of the world market place not, top 20% of the world, yes, rest no. To be honest I think a better prediction would be Nokia licenses webOS from palm, or flat out buys palm, and includes Qt. The market is big enough also, there does not have to be a “winner”. Diversity, competition, and profit can all co exist. You are STILL thinking in Microsoft economic terms.
>>And now Nokia has reportedly done the unthinkable, which is to rewrite Maemo, its Linux, in Qt.<<
Huh? Maemo, Nokia's linux distro is based on Debian and is not 'written' in Qt. That's like saying Ubuntu is 'written' in GTK.
Agreed, I think he meant to say something like “…Maemo, its Android, in QT.” That’s how I took it, anyway.
Ha Ha nice one, very funny
You’ve really got your finger on the pulse of technology haven’t you?
Advantageously, the post is certainly a laudable topic about the ipad. Although I dot harmonise with some minor points in general I
I just set my alarm for “more than 12 months from now” — I’ll check back to see your follow-up article…
Best regards,
Maemo fanboi
“feature phones are going to disappear …”
Can’t agree with that. See this excellent analysis on why they won’t disappear anytime soon :
http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2010/01/behind-the-smartphone-craze-redrawing-the-map-of-mobile-platforms/
Instead of disappearing, lines will blur between what is a smart vs dumb phone.
Device makers like Samsung, LG make very nice touch phones that would qualify as “feature phones” by technical software standards (i.e. with a proprietary real-time OS) but actually have polished UIs and all features you’d expect from “smart” phones.
And they actually sold 330 millions of those last year.
Compare that with the # of iPhones sold in 2009: 25 millions
There was an interesting chart in today’s Nokia earnings report.
It looks that they’ll continue to be strong in the developing markets where mobile handset is the most important software platform.
NOKIA MOBILE DEVICE VOLUME BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA
(million units) 2009 2008 YoY Change
Europe 107.0 114.9 -6.9%
Middle East & 77.6 81.0 -4.2%
Africa
Greater China 72.6 71.3 1.8%
AsiaPacific 123.5 134.0 -7.8%
North America 13.5 15.7 -14.0%
Latin America 37.6 51.5 -27.0%
Total 431.8 468.4 -7.8%
can’t be more wrong mr. cringely
I distinctly remember owning a sharp zaurus 5500:
http://ixbtlabs.com/articles/sharpzaurus/index.html
it ran linux with a QT ui.
in 2002
QT is not an os it is a ui, like Aqua, or Aero. again, it is not an OS. what Nokia did was buy a portable UI library from a company that made the best one available at the time, and is now porting their skin or theme to that UI.
this is because the nokia OS was several different OSes, and developers were sick and tired of having to write their app multiple times for the same manufacturer’s different hardware.
Bob:
As author of BlackBerry Planet (Wiley, 2009), I have to agree with your contention that RIM will be one of the last three standing. They have good strong cash flow from their BlackBerry Enterprise Server business that can subsidize their global thrust. They are clearly targeting Nokia while they are down. They now make their low end smartphones in factories around the world. They act like Nokia and forge strong partnerships with local carriers to they can adapt to local conditions. And they are finally getting a decent browser based roughly on WebKit. One of RIM’s big advantage is their frugal use of bandwidth. In some cases they use 1/20th of the bandwidth that the iPhone uses.
Alastair Sweeny
Hey, for once I beat the master at the prediction game!
Bob, your article is so close to the one I wrote on my blog back in 2007 (itself the summary of an article I wrote in the Greek PC magazine three years before that in fact) that I would be tempted to sue you. (Were it not for the fact that your articles inspire me and ignite my thinking process so often that it is usually the other way around!!)
For what it is worth for all of us in the tech prediction game:
http://www.alexanderchalkidis.com/blog/post/2007/12/Why-I-would-not-rush-to-buy-Nokia-stocks-or-buy-their-phones.aspx
Lots of Great information in your posting, I bookmarked your blog so I can visit again in the future, Thanks, Lilia Romar
I am always looking for stuff about topics that I don’t know of. It’s tough to find things that you don’t know of, because what do you search for?
This is the type of thing I love to read about on something new to me. Nice share! Thank you.
Any 1 learn how to unlock ipod nano ?
acknowledged it is posible, there’s particular rumours industry experts easy it really is, still i have usually been looking so purchased will surely. i will be procedure produced by mexico!
My searchs esteem Internet went answered predominance your blog. This is a beaultiful blog.
I’ve had my Chocolate Touch because it came out. I employed to have a Razr. I’ve been seeking around at the filesystem on Bitpim and just began putting flash wallpapers on it. I’ve also checked to see how EnV Touch themes appear on it. I’d like to start trying to make themes and wallpapers in Adobe Flash CS4. But I just started, so it’ll probably be awhile before I get anything. Tongue
Nice stuff on, i’ll be visiting more often
Great, great post. Do you think you could do some reviews on iPod apps? I think it would be very helpful
cheap VPS
YES! I finally found this site! I’ve been seeking just for this article for such a long time!!
Ur feeds are fed in2 other blogger’s RSS feeders, making it syndicated or putting in anoda way, people out dere will subscribe to dem & receive online copies of your text.