<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pictures in Our Heads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/</link>
	<description>Cringely on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:34:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nora Tafer</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-13014</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora Tafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-13014</guid>
		<description>Great post - As an rough gemstone cutting service provider&lt;/a&gt; this is interesting.I&#039;m happy:glad I found this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; As an rough gemstone cutting service provider this is interesting.I&#8217;m happy:glad I found this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zusch Login &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Life, the User Interface, and Everything</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-11547</link>
		<dc:creator>Zusch Login &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Life, the User Interface, and Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-11547</guid>
		<description>[...] bypass it and go straight to thought-controlled computers. On our own planet, labs are pursing thought-controlled UIs, and it&#8217;s easy to believe that this will be the ultimate UI: no words, no actions at all, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bypass it and go straight to thought-controlled computers. On our own planet, labs are pursing thought-controlled UIs, and it&#8217;s easy to believe that this will be the ultimate UI: no words, no actions at all, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astork</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-9379</link>
		<dc:creator>astork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-9379</guid>
		<description>Looks like sunglasses Myvu Personal Media Viewers 640X480 wearable video display  http://myvutestsite.us/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like sunglasses Myvu Personal Media Viewers 640X480 wearable video display  <a href="http://myvutestsite.us/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://myvutestsite.us/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-9374</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-9374</guid>
		<description>Random thoughts...

While we&#039;ve been making computers &quot;smarter,&quot; people have been getting dumbed down by advertising, by bad education, by political propaganda, etc. As Dave Frishberg sang, we&#039;re &quot;marooned in a blizzard of lies.&quot;

Even honest research in honest journals is so overwhelming in quantity that it&#039;s hard to sift through enough of it to find the gems. And worthwhile stuff can easily end up ignored. Who knows if a great general solution to some serious current problem was published in 1952, and forgotten? It doesn&#039;t help that fueled partly by the factors mentioned in the previous paragraph, we have such an attitude of &quot;tommorowism&quot; that an idea from last night gets dismissed as &quot;Oh, that&#039;s so 12 hours ago!&quot;

Maybe it will become trendy to respect the best of the past again, and &quot;tomorrowism&quot; will eventually be dismissed as &quot;so 2009.&quot;

Computers may become more clever, but can they become wise?

I suppose that the Singularity means that computers will be so powerful that we&#039;ll be able to test the &quot;million monkeys typing out Shakespeare&quot; and other Darwinian ideas, that random variation can eventually lead to higher and higher intelligence. But what happens if it doesn&#039;t work? Then we&#039;re left with a big question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>While we&#8217;ve been making computers &#8220;smarter,&#8221; people have been getting dumbed down by advertising, by bad education, by political propaganda, etc. As Dave Frishberg sang, we&#8217;re &#8220;marooned in a blizzard of lies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even honest research in honest journals is so overwhelming in quantity that it&#8217;s hard to sift through enough of it to find the gems. And worthwhile stuff can easily end up ignored. Who knows if a great general solution to some serious current problem was published in 1952, and forgotten? It doesn&#8217;t help that fueled partly by the factors mentioned in the previous paragraph, we have such an attitude of &#8220;tommorowism&#8221; that an idea from last night gets dismissed as &#8220;Oh, that&#8217;s so 12 hours ago!&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe it will become trendy to respect the best of the past again, and &#8220;tomorrowism&#8221; will eventually be dismissed as &#8220;so 2009.&#8221;</p>
<p>Computers may become more clever, but can they become wise?</p>
<p>I suppose that the Singularity means that computers will be so powerful that we&#8217;ll be able to test the &#8220;million monkeys typing out Shakespeare&#8221; and other Darwinian ideas, that random variation can eventually lead to higher and higher intelligence. But what happens if it doesn&#8217;t work? Then we&#8217;re left with a big question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Device Screen Resolution &#8211; here&#8217;s looking at you &#124; StayGoLinks</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-9083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Device Screen Resolution &#8211; here&#8217;s looking at you &#124; StayGoLinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-9083</guid>
		<description>[...] an informed spectator of the digital world.&#160; Robert X. Cringely suggests that the solution is Pictures in Our Heads.&#160; He too sees a huge growth for mobile devices since the purchasing cycle is rapid and new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an informed spectator of the digital world.&nbsp; Robert X. Cringely suggests that the solution is Pictures in Our Heads.&nbsp; He too sees a huge growth for mobile devices since the purchasing cycle is rapid and new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gears is Gone, Kind Of &#8226; Full Disclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-9058</link>
		<dc:creator>Gears is Gone, Kind Of &#8226; Full Disclosure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-9058</guid>
		<description>[...] and Apple for the next generation of computing (a mobile generation, as Robert X. Cringely reminds us), Google seems to be willing to compromise on means as long as the ends are the same. For them web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Apple for the next generation of computing (a mobile generation, as Robert X. Cringely reminds us), Google seems to be willing to compromise on means as long as the ends are the same. For them web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-8993</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-8993</guid>
		<description>The thought interface is intriguing, for me, to say the least. Only price has prevented me from owning a BrainFingers(tm) headband and home research into mind over machine control. Only the bulkiness of heads up displays has prevented me from home research into mind over machine feedback. Both of these are the same old price point and endless march of progress design barriers to entry that Bob has so masterfully communicated time and again. For me the Singularity represents the true human 2.0 where our physical 1.0 five senses mind in body control begin to be supplanted by the sixth sense of mind out of body control, something I would suggest we&#039;ve all been dreaming (and using to get from A to B all these eons and what seems to me to be the principle driver of all of this innovation in the first place.) For me the hand (keyboard), eye (monitor) and ear (auditory) interfaces by thought human 1.0 has always been where my 2.0 brain has been trapped, I&#039;ve been handicapped all my life by bodily limitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thought interface is intriguing, for me, to say the least. Only price has prevented me from owning a BrainFingers(tm) headband and home research into mind over machine control. Only the bulkiness of heads up displays has prevented me from home research into mind over machine feedback. Both of these are the same old price point and endless march of progress design barriers to entry that Bob has so masterfully communicated time and again. For me the Singularity represents the true human 2.0 where our physical 1.0 five senses mind in body control begin to be supplanted by the sixth sense of mind out of body control, something I would suggest we&#8217;ve all been dreaming (and using to get from A to B all these eons and what seems to me to be the principle driver of all of this innovation in the first place.) For me the hand (keyboard), eye (monitor) and ear (auditory) interfaces by thought human 1.0 has always been where my 2.0 brain has been trapped, I&#8217;ve been handicapped all my life by bodily limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-8915</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-8915</guid>
		<description>Regarding the problem of input, those tiny keyboards have caused the adaptation of language to overcome their limitations: witness a teen&#039;s texting. It is an evolving, bona fide dialect with a grammar and a social glue to it&#039;s users. We have always adapted instinctively to our unyielding devices. Those screens, however...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the problem of input, those tiny keyboards have caused the adaptation of language to overcome their limitations: witness a teen&#8217;s texting. It is an evolving, bona fide dialect with a grammar and a social glue to it&#8217;s users. We have always adapted instinctively to our unyielding devices. Those screens, however&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Numbers, Volume 35 – Thanksgiving Week Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-8876</link>
		<dc:creator>Numbers, Volume 35 – Thanksgiving Week Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-8876</guid>
		<description>[...] Shipping More Units It’s important to understand just how quickly things are changing. Part of this comes down to the hardware replacement cycle for these devices. A PC generation is traditionally 18 months long and most of us are unwilling to be more than two generations behind, so we get a new desktop or notebook every 36 months. Mobile devices don’t last that long, nor are they expected to. The replacement cycle is 18 months, reinforced by customer contract terms that give us a new device every couple of years in return for staying a loyal customer. Mobile hardware generations last nine months, and 18 tends to be the maximum time any of us use a single device. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shipping More Units It’s important to understand just how quickly things are changing. Part of this comes down to the hardware replacement cycle for these devices. A PC generation is traditionally 18 months long and most of us are unwilling to be more than two generations behind, so we get a new desktop or notebook every 36 months. Mobile devices don’t last that long, nor are they expected to. The replacement cycle is 18 months, reinforced by customer contract terms that give us a new device every couple of years in return for staying a loyal customer. Mobile hardware generations last nine months, and 18 tends to be the maximum time any of us use a single device. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 35 &#8211; Thanksgiving Week Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/11/pictures-in-our-heads/comment-page-2/#comment-8872</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 35 &#8211; Thanksgiving Week Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=870#comment-8872</guid>
		<description>[...] Shipping More Units  It’s important to understand just how quickly things are changing. Part of this comes down to the hardware replacement cycle for these devices. A PC generation is traditionally 18 months long and most of us are unwilling to be more than two generations behind, so we get a new desktop or notebook every 36 months. Mobile devices don’t last that long, nor are they expected to. The replacement cycle is 18 months, reinforced by customer contract terms that give us a new device every couple of years in return for staying a loyal customer. Mobile hardware generations last nine months, and 18 tends to be the maximum time any of us use a single device. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shipping More Units  It’s important to understand just how quickly things are changing. Part of this comes down to the hardware replacement cycle for these devices. A PC generation is traditionally 18 months long and most of us are unwilling to be more than two generations behind, so we get a new desktop or notebook every 36 months. Mobile devices don’t last that long, nor are they expected to. The replacement cycle is 18 months, reinforced by customer contract terms that give us a new device every couple of years in return for staying a loyal customer. Mobile hardware generations last nine months, and 18 tends to be the maximum time any of us use a single device. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
