<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cybersecurity Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/</link>
	<description>Cringely on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teeth Whitening New York</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-2/#comment-13924</link>
		<dc:creator>Teeth Whitening New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-13924</guid>
		<description>It seems like the Department of Homeland Security is really trying to beef up on cybersecurity. In my honest opinion it is a smart move.Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the Department of Homeland Security is really trying to beef up on cybersecurity. In my honest opinion it is a smart move.Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moneywise</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-2/#comment-10521</link>
		<dc:creator>Moneywise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-10521</guid>
		<description>Hello, probably our post is off topic but anyhow, I have gone surfing around your site and it appears extremely professional. It is obvious that you know the topic and you seem passionate about it. We are constructing a fresh site and I am striving to make it look good, and also provide quality website content. I&#039;ve gleaned a good deal visiting this internet site and also I anticipate more posts and will be back soon. Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, probably our post is off topic but anyhow, I have gone surfing around your site and it appears extremely professional. It is obvious that you know the topic and you seem passionate about it. We are constructing a fresh site and I am striving to make it look good, and also provide quality website content. I&#8217;ve gleaned a good deal visiting this internet site and also I anticipate more posts and will be back soon. Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What About the Other 11 Months? &#8211; Security Threat Research News</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-2/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>What About the Other 11 Months? &#8211; Security Threat Research News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>[...] I could get to it, Bob Cringely wrote almost everything that I was going to write in his blog post The Cybersecurity Myth &#8211; Cringely on technology. (NB. Similar to Bob&#8217;s correspondent, I have always disliked the term [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I could get to it, Bob Cringely wrote almost everything that I was going to write in his blog post The Cybersecurity Myth &#8211; Cringely on technology. (NB. Similar to Bob&#8217;s correspondent, I have always disliked the term [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Men Shavers</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-2/#comment-8960</link>
		<dc:creator>Men Shavers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-8960</guid>
		<description>Entschuldigen Sie, ich habe diese Phrase gelГ¶scht</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entschuldigen Sie, ich habe diese Phrase gelГ¶scht</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian W. Hwang</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-2/#comment-8805</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian W. Hwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-8805</guid>
		<description>cctv surveillance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cctv surveillance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-2/#comment-7947</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-7947</guid>
		<description>People misunderstand the terminology used by goverment and corporate america. &quot;Expert&quot; does not mean &quot;Highest Skilled&quot; in hiring today. &quot;Expert&quot; means &quot;lowest cost&quot;. The government will find 1000 newly minted CISSPs willing to work for minimum wage. 

Don&#039;t believe me? Go read DOD 8570. Security+ is considered a security certification, but the CCIE Security is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People misunderstand the terminology used by goverment and corporate america. &#8220;Expert&#8221; does not mean &#8220;Highest Skilled&#8221; in hiring today. &#8220;Expert&#8221; means &#8220;lowest cost&#8221;. The government will find 1000 newly minted CISSPs willing to work for minimum wage. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? Go read DOD 8570. Security+ is considered a security certification, but the CCIE Security is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyber Crime &#124; snettsblog</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-2/#comment-7366</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyber Crime &#124; snettsblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-7366</guid>
		<description>[...] would increase the chances to reach the number of professionals to be hired. In the article &#8220;The Cybersecurity Myth&#8221; by IT pro Bob Cringley he questions the availability of the 1,000 cybersec [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would increase the chances to reach the number of professionals to be hired. In the article &#8220;The Cybersecurity Myth&#8221; by IT pro Bob Cringley he questions the availability of the 1,000 cybersec [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybersecurity: Is the U.S. Government doing enough? &#124; IT Security &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-7340</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybersecurity: Is the U.S. Government doing enough? &#124; IT Security &#124; TechRepublic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-7340</guid>
		<description>[...] feeling pretty good about this. Then, I read IT pundit Bob Cringely&#8217;s article entitled &#8220;The Cybersecurity Myth&#8220;. He contends there aren&#8217;t 1000 cybersecurity experts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] feeling pretty good about this. Then, I read IT pundit Bob Cringely&#8217;s article entitled &#8220;The Cybersecurity Myth&#8220;. He contends there aren&#8217;t 1000 cybersecurity experts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Welker</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-7248</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Welker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-7248</guid>
		<description>I think the definition of &quot;cybersecurity&quot; is derived from &quot;cyberspace&quot; rather than from &quot;cybernetics&quot; (the former in turn being derived from the latter). One definition of the former appears here: 
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/c/cyberspace.html Since &quot;cybersecurity&quot; would presumably then mean security in (and at the perimeter of) &quot;cyberspace&quot;, DHS would not appear to be out of line. Sorry if the culture the actual world doesn&#039;t conform to that of Principia Cybernetica, but I think you&#039;ll have to learn to live with it. At least until you either (a) get the Department of Motor Vehicles to change its name to Department of Engine Vehicles or (b) ban engines in favor of motors -- the latter seems far more probable at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the definition of &#8220;cybersecurity&#8221; is derived from &#8220;cyberspace&#8221; rather than from &#8220;cybernetics&#8221; (the former in turn being derived from the latter). One definition of the former appears here:<br />
<a href="http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/c/cyberspace.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/c/cyberspace.html</a> Since &#8220;cybersecurity&#8221; would presumably then mean security in (and at the perimeter of) &#8220;cyberspace&#8221;, DHS would not appear to be out of line. Sorry if the culture the actual world doesn&#8217;t conform to that of Principia Cybernetica, but I think you&#8217;ll have to learn to live with it. At least until you either (a) get the Department of Motor Vehicles to change its name to Department of Engine Vehicles or (b) ban engines in favor of motors &#8212; the latter seems far more probable at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/10/the-cybersecurity-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-7232</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=726#comment-7232</guid>
		<description>Well, if you hold the CISSP and you are willing to state that
it&#039;s &quot;a joke&quot;, you have violated the code of ethics you agreed 
to when you accepted it.  So in all good faith you should contact
the ISC2 now and let them revoke your cert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you hold the CISSP and you are willing to state that<br />
it&#8217;s &#8220;a joke&#8221;, you have violated the code of ethics you agreed<br />
to when you accepted it.  So in all good faith you should contact<br />
the ISC2 now and let them revoke your cert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
