<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" > <channel><title>Comments on: Neutrality Begins at Home</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/</link> <description>Cringely on technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: cheap VPS</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-21484</link> <dc:creator>cheap VPS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:34:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-21484</guid> <description>Bob, I’m not sure your theory is correct. If the ATA is plugged into a switch port by itself, it shouldn’t even see the frames emitted by your PC, as the switch is sending those directly to the gateway. The switch should queue and round-robin the frames from both the ATA and the PC into the gateway’s port, at which point the gateway should prioritize them. And so long as you’re content with 100Mbps, those 100Mbps switches should do that job on a 100Mbps fabric just as well as they ever did.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.turbovps.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cheap VPS&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I’m not sure your theory is correct. If the ATA is plugged into a switch port by itself, it shouldn’t even see the frames emitted by your PC, as the switch is sending those directly to the gateway. The switch should queue and round-robin the frames from both the ATA and the PC into the gateway’s port, at which point the gateway should prioritize them. And so long as you’re content with 100Mbps, those 100Mbps switches should do that job on a 100Mbps fabric just as well as they ever did.<a href="http://www.turbovps.com/" rel="nofollow">cheap VPS</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Free Voip Software</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-21363</link> <dc:creator>Free Voip Software</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-21363</guid> <description>I&#039;ve beenreading a lotof your article. I consider myself a lurker here and it is my first time to comment on your articles. I can say that this is if not the best you did. Keep it up buddy. Thanks for the infos. -&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stresswiki.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Free VoIP Softwares&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve beenreading a lotof your article. I consider myself a lurker here and it is my first time to comment on your articles. I can say that this is if not the best you did. Keep it up buddy. Thanks for the infos. -<a href="http://www.stresswiki.com" rel="nofollow">Free VoIP Softwares</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Claretta Grove</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-20562</link> <dc:creator>Claretta Grove</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:03:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-20562</guid> <description>Hi all, im really happy :) i just got my new IPhone 4G for FREE lol!. I didn&#039;t think it would work but it pulled through. I followed the steps on http://freeiphone4g4u.blogspot.com and i just thought ide share it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, im really happy <img src='http://www.cringely.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> i just got my new IPhone 4G for FREE lol!. I didn&#8217;t think it would work but it pulled through. I followed the steps on <a href="http://freeiphone4g4u.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://freeiphone4g4u.blogspot.com</a> and i just thought ide share it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Servicio Voip</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-20351</link> <dc:creator>Servicio Voip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:51:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-20351</guid> <description>Nice share,thanks and good luck! I, Cringely  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Neutrality Begins at Home - Cringely on technology</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice share,thanks and good luck!<br /> I, Cringely  &raquo; Blog Archive   &raquo; Neutrality Begins at Home &#8211; Cringely on technology</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DIANA Edgerly</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-18609</link> <dc:creator>DIANA Edgerly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:17:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-18609</guid> <description>http://bit.ly/appleipadmedia</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bit.ly/appleipadmedia" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/appleipadmedia</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diedre Stellato</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-18537</link> <dc:creator>Diedre Stellato</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:53:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-18537</guid> <description>Ah! This really is amazing! Thanks for countering severalsome misconceptions I had noticed about this as of late.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! This really is amazing! Thanks for countering severalsome misconceptions I had noticed about this as of late.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel Lott (Service Computers, LLC.)</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-6869</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Lott (Service Computers, LLC.)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:07:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-6869</guid> <description>I&#039;ve noticed the same problem at my office.There are some differences however, my workstation is by far the fastest on the network (Q6600 w/4GB RAM) -- not to mention my ATA is plugged into my workstation (it is a MagicJack device).I&#039;ve set the router to give these priority, set windows to do the same, even given the MagicJack software realtime priority &amp; locked it to a specific core.Nevertheless, calls over 20 minutes begin breaking up.  Calls over an hour eventually drop the outgoing voice channel.  No-one from either cable co or MagicJack has been able to come up with a theory, much less a solution.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the same problem at my office.</p><p>There are some differences however, my workstation is by far the fastest on the network (Q6600 w/4GB RAM) &#8212; not to mention my ATA is plugged into my workstation (it is a MagicJack device).</p><p>I&#8217;ve set the router to give these priority, set windows to do the same, even given the MagicJack software realtime priority &amp; locked it to a specific core.</p><p>Nevertheless, calls over 20 minutes begin breaking up.  Calls over an hour eventually drop the outgoing voice channel.  No-one from either cable co or MagicJack has been able to come up with a theory, much less a solution.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith Page</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-6832</link> <dc:creator>Keith Page</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:13:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-6832</guid> <description>I had the same problem and have trying everything you have tried but I eventually settled with connecting my vonage through a switch to the modem and my OpenBSD firewall with traffic shaping to the same switch. B/c we&#039;re on SHAW cable both devices get their own publicly routable address. My fax and Phone quality hasn&#039;t been an issue since. I&#039;m using a WRT54GP2 device bought around 2006. I&#039;ve been operating on this setup just fine for about 4 months.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem and have trying everything you have tried but I eventually settled with connecting my vonage through a switch to the modem and my OpenBSD firewall with traffic shaping to the same switch. B/c we&#8217;re on SHAW cable both devices get their own publicly routable address. My fax and Phone quality hasn&#8217;t been an issue since. I&#8217;m using a WRT54GP2 device bought around 2006. I&#8217;ve been operating on this setup just fine for about 4 months.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Schewe</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-6258</link> <dc:creator>Jon Schewe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:10:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-6258</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s your PC. I&#039;ve got a 3 year old 64-bit AMD connected to my network at 1Gbps and my Vonage is fine. I&#039;ve also got 3 other computers in the house connected to the same internet connection. The things I changed: 1) Put in a Linksys router and loaded it with dd-wrt 2) Added traffic shaping for all of the VOIP ports and the MAC address of my vonage device 3) And this seems to be important for getting calls to come in correctly. I gave my vonage device a static IP and told my router to forward all packets bound for ports 10000 through 20000 (UDP only) to the vonage device.It&#039;s been fine since then.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s your PC. I&#8217;ve got a 3 year old 64-bit AMD connected to my network at 1Gbps and my Vonage is fine. I&#8217;ve also got 3 other computers in the house connected to the same internet connection. The things I changed:<br /> 1) Put in a Linksys router and loaded it with dd-wrt<br /> 2) Added traffic shaping for all of the VOIP ports and the MAC address of my vonage device<br /> 3) And this seems to be important for getting calls to come in correctly. I gave my vonage device a static IP and told my router to forward all packets bound for ports 10000 through 20000 (UDP only) to the vonage device.</p><p>It&#8217;s been fine since then.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nate Q</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/09/neutrality-begins-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-6160</link> <dc:creator>Nate Q</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:16:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=709#comment-6160</guid> <description>Bob, I could be wrong about your particular usage - but I used Skype from my iPhone a couple days ago. All I had to do was connect to the WiFi and I was able to hold a conversation with a friend of mine in Ukraine. It was a decent connection, and I was impressed that I didn&#039;t have to be connected to the computer or anything besides the wireless. Love your blog.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I could be wrong about your particular usage &#8211; but I used Skype from my iPhone a couple days ago. All I had to do was connect to the WiFi and I was able to hold a conversation with a friend of mine in Ukraine. It was a decent connection, and I was impressed that I didn&#8217;t have to be connected to the computer or anything besides the wireless. Love your blog.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.045 seconds using disk

Served from: www.cringely.com @ 2010-09-10 16:50:16 -->