<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Cringely on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Freemon SandleWould</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-6045</link>
		<dc:creator>Freemon SandleWould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-6045</guid>
		<description>Have you seen Michael Shedlocks economic blog?   

We do not have capitalism.  We have a perverted form of capitalism commonly called &quot;socialism&quot;.  And lest you think more regulation the answer just ask yourself &quot;why given the myriad rules we have are we having problems.  Silly lefties.  Its your wack job attempts to regulate everything that have gotten us here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen Michael Shedlocks economic blog?   </p>
<p>We do not have capitalism.  We have a perverted form of capitalism commonly called &#8220;socialism&#8221;.  And lest you think more regulation the answer just ask yourself &#8220;why given the myriad rules we have are we having problems.  Silly lefties.  Its your wack job attempts to regulate everything that have gotten us here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5419</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5419</guid>
		<description>Disclosure: I&#039;m a friend of one of the participants in the video and I admire the work she does.

That said, the people in this video attempt to make a case that they never explore fully in its 20 minutes. Economic bloggers, because they&#039;re outside the restrictions of mainstream media influence, stimulate entrepreneurship which will save our economy? How? I&#039;m hoping the conference this video was made about made more substantive connections between assertions, conclusions, and forecasts.

Capitalism certainly isn&#039;t dead. It&#039;s very much alive, funneling enormous quantities of tax revenues into private offshore accounts. 

It&#039;s unregulated capitalism that *should* die, because it&#039;s killing the majority of us who don&#039;t have golden parachutes. We need more antitrust laws back on the books, and strictly enforced. Seat belts didn&#039;t destroy Detroit; chasing nothing but short-term profits did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disclosure: I&#8217;m a friend of one of the participants in the video and I admire the work she does.</p>
<p>That said, the people in this video attempt to make a case that they never explore fully in its 20 minutes. Economic bloggers, because they&#8217;re outside the restrictions of mainstream media influence, stimulate entrepreneurship which will save our economy? How? I&#8217;m hoping the conference this video was made about made more substantive connections between assertions, conclusions, and forecasts.</p>
<p>Capitalism certainly isn&#8217;t dead. It&#8217;s very much alive, funneling enormous quantities of tax revenues into private offshore accounts. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s unregulated capitalism that *should* die, because it&#8217;s killing the majority of us who don&#8217;t have golden parachutes. We need more antitrust laws back on the books, and strictly enforced. Seat belts didn&#8217;t destroy Detroit; chasing nothing but short-term profits did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Young</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5417</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5417</guid>
		<description>Cuba doesn&#039;t have snow and road salt.  If you go past the snow line in the US, you find lots more old cars than in the rust belt.  Cars get junked due to rust than any other reason.  No skeleton, no organs, no body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuba doesn&#8217;t have snow and road salt.  If you go past the snow line in the US, you find lots more old cars than in the rust belt.  Cars get junked due to rust than any other reason.  No skeleton, no organs, no body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Young</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5416</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5416</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve described the Financial Services sector of the economy.  Oh, you knew that!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve described the Financial Services sector of the economy.  Oh, you knew that!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Young</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5415</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5415</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what somebody said to Sarah Palin.  Look what that bought us:  birthers, Russia from the backyard, death panels, and assorted other mental tripe.  Some people should just be quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what somebody said to Sarah Palin.  Look what that bought us:  birthers, Russia from the backyard, death panels, and assorted other mental tripe.  Some people should just be quiet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Birch</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5414</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Birch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5414</guid>
		<description>Imagine America where being an entrepreneur didn&#039;t mean you needed to gamble with your health plan nor your family&#039;s health plan. This is why we need the public option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine America where being an entrepreneur didn&#8217;t mean you needed to gamble with your health plan nor your family&#8217;s health plan. This is why we need the public option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karel</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>karel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>Dmitry Orlov says GM is not worth saving as we have enough cars to last us at least 30 years - see how well Cuba did without introducing any more carbon by making new cars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dmitry Orlov says GM is not worth saving as we have enough cars to last us at least 30 years &#8211; see how well Cuba did without introducing any more carbon by making new cars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economics Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>Economics Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>[...] ran across this video from the Kaufmann Foundation about economics bloggers.  It was an interesting watch so I thought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ran across this video from the Kaufmann Foundation about economics bloggers.  It was an interesting watch so I thought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5407</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5407</guid>
		<description>It is a shame how many companies do not work the numbers and do not do the things needed to keep the business &quot;sustainable.&quot;  GM for example.  

Then on the other hand there are many products that are mature, make a good profit, but are at the limit of their business growth.  There is no more product to be sold, no more costs to cut.  From a Wall Street point of view, these are loser investments.  Yet they can turn in a consistent profit year after year.  Companies discard good, proven money makers because they make their stock seem boring.  It is a shame.  

What is the biggest investment lesson in the last year? -- diversification.  Those boring products and services could have kept many companies out of trouble, if they hadn&#039;t dumped them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a shame how many companies do not work the numbers and do not do the things needed to keep the business &#8220;sustainable.&#8221;  GM for example.  </p>
<p>Then on the other hand there are many products that are mature, make a good profit, but are at the limit of their business growth.  There is no more product to be sold, no more costs to cut.  From a Wall Street point of view, these are loser investments.  Yet they can turn in a consistent profit year after year.  Companies discard good, proven money makers because they make their stock seem boring.  It is a shame.  </p>
<p>What is the biggest investment lesson in the last year? &#8212; diversification.  Those boring products and services could have kept many companies out of trouble, if they hadn&#8217;t dumped them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ２００９年９月０２日（水） &#171; maclalala:link</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/08/economic-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-5406</link>
		<dc:creator>２００９年９月０２日（水） &#171; maclalala:link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=617#comment-5406</guid>
		<description>[...] Economic Bloggers &#124; I, Cringely 〈経済ブロガーたち〉［→ maclalala:annex］ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Economic Bloggers | I, Cringely 〈経済ブロガーたち〉［→ maclalala:annex］ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
