<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Bentonville Mafia</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/</link> <description>Cringely on technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: cheap VPS</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-21464</link> <dc:creator>cheap VPS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-21464</guid> <description>Bob, why would keeping Live Search(or whatever it is it’ll be called next, Kumo?) be a good idea but not keeping adCenter and DAP? Those are exactly how they get any revenue from Search. You suggest they should hire other companies to do this work for them? They did, and then they decided to buy them before Google or Yahoo could get a chance to(Aquantive/Atlas), primarily for the ad network technology and management and analysis tools that Atlas has. If Microsoft doesn’t have its own ads infrastructure it makes no sense to have a search engine anymore since they wouldn’t have any way to get revenue from it. Besides, the long term goal for them is to utilize the same ISV approach they have successfully for years with packaged software in the online advertising business. Microsoft has always been good at leveraging other people’s sales forces and their only hope is to be a technology platform for advertising and not an Agency. This is why within the next year they’ll probably sell Razorfish to WPP or Omnicom, they could probably get upwards of $1billion. Microsoft creates the platform, runs the infrastructure, but the ISVs/advertising agencies actually provide the campaign design, management and analysis services and the customer hand holding, much like Dell or HP might do for server products. Just like Azure will emerge as a platform with APIs for developers of grid based software and service offerings Microsoft’s advertising platform will be just a development and infrastructure platform for agencies to market their customers products in the most effective manner online(and in many other emerging advertising media that will be digitized) and large publishers to monetize their content, whether it’s websites, television, in-game advertising, etc. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.turbovps.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cheap VPS&lt;/a&gt; The shortened version is Microsoft will ditch the content business and turn online advertising into a technology business that they can sell like any other server and tools product. At least that’s the only way I can see this being successful(in a profit perspective) long term.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, why would keeping Live Search(or whatever it is it’ll be called next, Kumo?) be a good idea but not keeping adCenter and DAP? Those are exactly how they get any revenue from Search. You suggest they should hire other companies to do this work for them? They did, and then they decided to buy them before Google or Yahoo could get a chance to(Aquantive/Atlas), primarily for the ad network technology and management and analysis tools that Atlas has. If Microsoft doesn’t have its own ads infrastructure it makes no sense to have a search engine anymore since they wouldn’t have any way to get revenue from it. Besides, the long term goal for them is to utilize the same ISV approach they have successfully for years with packaged software in the online advertising business. Microsoft has always been good at leveraging other people’s sales forces and their only hope is to be a technology platform for advertising and not an Agency. This is why within the next year they’ll probably sell Razorfish to WPP or Omnicom, they could probably get upwards of $1billion. Microsoft creates the platform, runs the infrastructure, but the ISVs/advertising agencies actually provide the campaign design, management and analysis services and the customer hand holding, much like Dell or HP might do for server products. Just like Azure will emerge as a platform with APIs for developers of grid based software and service offerings Microsoft’s advertising platform will be just a development and infrastructure platform for agencies to market their customers products in the most effective manner online(and in many other emerging advertising media that will be digitized) and large publishers to monetize their content, whether it’s websites, television, in-game advertising, etc.<br /> <a href="http://www.turbovps.com/" rel="nofollow">cheap VPS</a><br /> The shortened version is Microsoft will ditch the content business and turn online advertising into a technology business that they can sell like any other server and tools product. At least that’s the only way I can see this being successful(in a profit perspective) long term.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Odilia Guardarrama</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-21360</link> <dc:creator>Odilia Guardarrama</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:16:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-21360</guid> <description>Damn interesting post, I for one looking through it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn interesting post, I for one looking through it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Private Servers</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-21135</link> <dc:creator>Private Servers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:28:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-21135</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intimatelyrics.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lyrics&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intimatelyrics.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;short stories&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.intimatelyrics.com" rel="nofollow">lyrics</a> <a href="http://www.intimatelyrics.com" rel="nofollow">short stories</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Electronic Cigarettes</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-20975</link> <dc:creator>Electronic Cigarettes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:48:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-20975</guid> <description>Thank you for the sensible critique. Me &amp; my neighbour were preparing to do some research about that. We got a good book on that matter from our local library and most books where not as influensive as your information. I am very glad to see such information which I was searching for a long time.This made very glad =)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the sensible critique. Me &amp; my neighbour were preparing to do some research about that. We got a good book on that matter from our local library and most books where not as influensive as your information. I am very glad to see such information which I was searching for a long time.This made very glad =)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: easy lose weight</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-20226</link> <dc:creator>easy lose weight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-20226</guid> <description>HELP! I?m currently being held prisoner by the China mafia and being forced to post spam comments on blogs! If you don?t approve this they will kill me. They?re coming back now. Please send help!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELP! I?m currently being held prisoner by the China mafia and being forced to post spam comments on blogs! If you don?t approve this they will kill me. They?re coming back now. Please send help!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: budgeting for a baby</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-19967</link> <dc:creator>budgeting for a baby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:58:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-19967</guid> <description>Budgeting For Public Managers By Bj Wood, John W. ... Budgeting for Public Managers Product Details:Product: Book (Hardcover) - 229 pages ISBN: 9780765625243 Author: John W. Swain, BJ Reed Publisher: ME Sharpe (February 2010)Release Date: Description: Benefiting from the authors&#039; many years of teaching ....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Budgeting For Public Managers By Bj Wood, John W. &#8230; Budgeting for Public Managers Product Details:Product: Book (Hardcover) &#8211; 229 pages ISBN: 9780765625243 Author: John W. Swain, BJ Reed Publisher: ME Sharpe (February 2010)Release Date: Description: Benefiting from the authors&#8217; many years of teaching &#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wow gold tips</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-17202</link> <dc:creator>wow gold tips</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-17202</guid> <description>the most hottest animation i have ever seen !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the most hottest animation i have ever seen !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ernesto Prado</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-14229</link> <dc:creator>Ernesto Prado</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:37:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-14229</guid> <description>This site I found had a great deal great information on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hotgamedownloads.info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;herbs&lt;/a&gt; and was really helpful. Its hard to find a good place with good information</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site I found had a great deal great information on <a href="http://www.hotgamedownloads.info" rel="nofollow">herbs</a> and was really helpful. Its hard to find a good place with good information</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Craig K. Ray</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-12735</link> <dc:creator>Craig K. Ray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-12735</guid> <description>I opened a business account having moved from Lloyds as I got suckered by the advertising. It took ages to open, they lost the signatories paperwork, took a month to change the business name and when money started coming in via BACS they would not let me withdraw it until it had sat in the account, cleared for 4 days????? I have never managed to speak to my business manager once.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I opened a business account having moved from Lloyds as I got suckered by the advertising. It took ages to open, they lost the signatories paperwork, took a month to change the business name and when money started coming in via BACS they would not let me withdraw it until it had sat in the account, cleared for 4 days????? I have never managed to speak to my business manager once.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/02/the-bentonville-mafia/comment-page-2/#comment-2074</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:50:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=259#comment-2074</guid> <description>Bob,As usual, you hit on some really great ideas.  I particularly like the idea about dropping Office for the Mac.  Microsoft could then offer Office over the web for Mac users who had to have access to the file formats.  This would kickstart &quot;Office Live&quot; since Mac users are more likely to try something new.  However, Microsoft should then recreate IE for the Mac and allow Mac clients to now participate in those parts of the web that require IE only browsers.  It would also make it easier to bring Mac&#039;s onto Corporate Networks with very little support from the IT department.  If possible, I would like to get your thoughts about this on another post in the future.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p><p>As usual, you hit on some really great ideas.  I particularly like the idea about dropping Office for the Mac.  Microsoft could then offer Office over the web for Mac users who had to have access to the file formats.  This would kickstart &#8220;Office Live&#8221; since Mac users are more likely to try something new.  However, Microsoft should then recreate IE for the Mac and allow Mac clients to now participate in those parts of the web that require IE only browsers.  It would also make it easier to bring Mac&#8217;s onto Corporate Networks with very little support from the IT department.  If possible, I would like to get your thoughts about this on another post in the future.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.067 seconds using disk

Served from: www.cringely.com @ 2010-09-10 17:48:22 -->