<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cringely suffers from gray cell imbalance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/</link>
	<description>Cringely on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boothe2795@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-14205</link>
		<dc:creator>Boothe2795@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-14205</guid>
		<description>Greetings. Initial I want to say that I actually like your blog, just observed it last week but I have been following it constantly since then. 

I look to come to an agreement with most of your ideas and beliefs and this submit is no exception.  

Thank you for a good weblog and I hope you keep up the beneficial work. If you do I will carry on to browse through it. 

Have a very good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings. Initial I want to say that I actually like your blog, just observed it last week but I have been following it constantly since then. </p>
<p>I look to come to an agreement with most of your ideas and beliefs and this submit is no exception.  </p>
<p>Thank you for a good weblog and I hope you keep up the beneficial work. If you do I will carry on to browse through it. </p>
<p>Have a very good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archos 704</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-2054</link>
		<dc:creator>Archos 704</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-2054</guid>
		<description>This is the second time I visit your blog and find an interesting article perfectly matching what I was searching for so I decided to add your feed to my RSS Reader. Thanks for you work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second time I visit your blog and find an interesting article perfectly matching what I was searching for so I decided to add your feed to my RSS Reader. Thanks for you work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-549</guid>
		<description>It seems more likely that Jobs&#039; hormone imbalance refers to insulin production. Following on his surgery in 2004 it would not be atypical of his condition to necessitate the removal of his entire pancreas, leaving him severely diabetic. I wish him the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems more likely that Jobs&#8217; hormone imbalance refers to insulin production. Following on his surgery in 2004 it would not be atypical of his condition to necessitate the removal of his entire pancreas, leaving him severely diabetic. I wish him the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-373</guid>
		<description>For those interested in what all the fuss is about;

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3403

I doubt Bob&#039;s Tin Foil Disk has much chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested in what all the fuss is about;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3403" rel="nofollow">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3403</a></p>
<p>I doubt Bob&#8217;s Tin Foil Disk has much chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill in NC</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill in NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-353</guid>
		<description>My mistake - Sandisk just announced a 240GB 2.5&quot; SSD for $499 MSRP.

Wonder what that will cost the end of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake &#8211; Sandisk just announced a 240GB 2.5&#8243; SSD for $499 MSRP.</p>
<p>Wonder what that will cost the end of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-348</guid>
		<description>You are correct, sir.  Not only will SSD change the i* world, it will much more materially change general business computing, which has recently been on an xml bender.  The SSD database machine will be the game changer; xml as datastore will instantly be passe&#039; (split infinitive and all).  The implications for cloud are similar.  Why store gigabytes of largely redundant xml files on a cloud you can&#039;t really trust, when you can control a few megabytes in postgres on a machine you can trust?  Those who understand what normal form databases look like will be in great demand (he said hopefully).

For those who don&#039;t believe, I offer Linus Torvalds.  A couple of years ago he said in an interview that file systems would be changed once rotating storage went away.  That was when I first became aware of SSD as a viable option.  At the time Texas Memory Systems was about the only vendor.  AnandTech just did a review, and their base machine used an Intel SSD.  Asking the simple question, &quot;what is the most logical database implementation if there is no difference in latency based on location?&quot; leads to the inevitable answer.  The cost savings of such systems is so large, that even American Express (and the rest of financial services) will be forced to abandon all that 30 to 40 year old COBOL/VSAM legacy codebase they so dearly love.  

Rotating storage is history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct, sir.  Not only will SSD change the i* world, it will much more materially change general business computing, which has recently been on an xml bender.  The SSD database machine will be the game changer; xml as datastore will instantly be passe&#8217; (split infinitive and all).  The implications for cloud are similar.  Why store gigabytes of largely redundant xml files on a cloud you can&#8217;t really trust, when you can control a few megabytes in postgres on a machine you can trust?  Those who understand what normal form databases look like will be in great demand (he said hopefully).</p>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t believe, I offer Linus Torvalds.  A couple of years ago he said in an interview that file systems would be changed once rotating storage went away.  That was when I first became aware of SSD as a viable option.  At the time Texas Memory Systems was about the only vendor.  AnandTech just did a review, and their base machine used an Intel SSD.  Asking the simple question, &#8220;what is the most logical database implementation if there is no difference in latency based on location?&#8221; leads to the inevitable answer.  The cost savings of such systems is so large, that even American Express (and the rest of financial services) will be forced to abandon all that 30 to 40 year old COBOL/VSAM legacy codebase they so dearly love.  </p>
<p>Rotating storage is history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seymour</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Seymour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-347</guid>
		<description>I think Steve is a Vegan and if he has undergone any cancer therapy, my understating is he better learn eat some animal protein or its going to be a hard road for him indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Steve is a Vegan and if he has undergone any cancer therapy, my understating is he better learn eat some animal protein or its going to be a hard road for him indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kunreuther</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kunreuther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-344</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://xkcd.com/527/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;xkcd&lt;/a&gt; weighs in on Steve Jobs non appearance at MacWorld.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://xkcd.com/527/" rel="nofollow">xkcd</a> weighs in on Steve Jobs non appearance at MacWorld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slimcat</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>slimcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Hey Bob, I can&#039;t imagine why my comment was flagged for moderation or why the comment script/java(?) added spaces between the words in &#039;a good macworld laugh from the onion&#039;. At this point, though, you may as well delete it along with this reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bob, I can&#8217;t imagine why my comment was flagged for moderation or why the comment script/java(?) added spaces between the words in &#8216;a good macworld laugh from the onion&#8217;. At this point, though, you may as well delete it along with this reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill in NC</title>
		<link>http://www.cringely.com/2009/01/cringely-suffers-from-gray-cell-imbalance/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill in NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cringely.com/?p=92#comment-341</guid>
		<description>SSDs are rapidly dropping in price.

A 256GB 2.5&quot; SSD is a $900 upgrade for the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro.

Likely half that price by the end of the year.

And conventional 2.5&quot; drives are pretty cheap already - $100 retail for a 500GB drive.

Don&#039;t see a place for a new, independent metal foil drive maker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SSDs are rapidly dropping in price.</p>
<p>A 256GB 2.5&#8243; SSD is a $900 upgrade for the new 17&#8243; MacBook Pro.</p>
<p>Likely half that price by the end of the year.</p>
<p>And conventional 2.5&#8243; drives are pretty cheap already &#8211; $100 retail for a 500GB drive.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t see a place for a new, independent metal foil drive maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
